Total Visits: 708


Edward Joseph Snowden, an early employee of Booz Allen Hamilton, a contractor with the National Security Agency (NSA) in the USA, leaked classified information demonstrating the government’s mass surveillance projects that were performed illegally. Right at that moment that his video interview aired, Snowden was comfortably near a television screen in Hong Kong watching his face plastered on every one of the main media outlets. On Sunday June 23, 2013, Snowden flew to Moscow, where yet wear transit to his final destination: Quito, Ecuador. Leaking US government classified information is considered a crime under US law and as such, Snowden faces charges of espionage, and theft of property with the US government. These charges could total a life inside a US federal prison. The fees for leaking classified government information offer a similar experience (if not worse) generally in most countries across the world. To be a US government employee who signed a binding agreement, Snowden knew what he was getting himself into when he leaked the details. Snowden knew the results of his crime, but held a top regard for his cause, thus holding the interview in Hong Kong, But when his actions were so valiant and hubby am true to his cause, then why run? My theory: he just wanted to spark a ruckus. Snowden featured in the 12-minute interview… 12 minutes that he thought could get a new world. Nevertheless there is no denying that Snowden released information which is valuable for that public to understand, his methods escape me. The very fact in the matter is Snowden tried to not remain anonymous, because he stated how the American government would then be capable of paint him as a villain. Although Snowden did turn out being a whistleblower, government entities do not need to paint him to be a villain, because he’s already done that part for the kids, by running from a genuine cause, afraid of the effects. Snowden can be a citizen of just one with the largest liberal democracies on earth, having a court system that is fair and just, and where under most states the executing is prohibited. Granted, while using the charges he's up against, he’d probably live the rest of his life within an isolated maximum-security prison cell, but his trial hearings will be public. There’s a great line between ruckus and change, and change most definitely doesn’t happen in 12 minutes. If Snowden planned to complete a real difference then why hold a 12-minute interview and bolt? Instead, Snowden needs to have step up in America, and went through judicial process with public hearings. This will San Francisco Escort provide him with the chance to reiterate his opinions and motivations towards the American public directly, as opposed to hide behind the veil on the media and loopholes in international law. I’m unsure what Snowden’s endgame is, there is however something I do know beyond doubt: our concise explaination a hero may be shamed. Our thought of democracy is a lot more threatened by those who are afraid to stand up for the purpose they believe in and face the results of these actions than by the government’s surveillance programs. Simple fact from the matter is: whether there is certainly solid proof of Snowden’s allegations resistant to the government, every one of us knew it absolutely was happening. There has been speculation on government surveillance for many years. Snowden provided us with proof, in a interview nearly 12,000 Kilometers away from the crime scene. No matter what true Snowden’s allegations are, it simply seems as if he’d carefully thought out plans to start out a war contrary to the government, so wipe his hands clean. The fact is that real change-makers can look upon the actions of Snowden as a disgrace to the passion for change. What if Nelson Mandela held a 12-minute interview in north america to encourage alternation in South Africa? Imagine Martin Luther King Jr. recorded his speech and played it from your screen when in front of millions? You have to wonder should they would have ever achieved cause real progress, and whether their passion could have outlived them all. Where’s Julian Assange today? Ask most of the people, and in addition they’ve probably already forgotten about him. He’s a prisoner by himself account, it doesn't matter how courageous his initial actions has been. We end up needing heroes like Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Gandhi, and Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. Heroes who act style and color . consequences some may face. Heroes that won't flee industry by storm fear. Any hero with valor would face the results of the actions. Snowden should be no exception to that particular, especially since his situation could be arguably better a lot comparison to heroes from less than long ago. Snowden’s motives may be true, but he has yet to prove himself to me. He should still fight with the cause he apparently believes in as an alternative to fleeing to your life in paradise… constantly overlooking his shoulder.